PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIUX vs. FCQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIUX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than FCQTX's 10.65% return.


DRIUX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.60%
YTD
4.02%
6M
3.89%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
5.14%

FCQTX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.82%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.12%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
4.02%9.01%3.86%8.09%-20.98%9.26%21.60%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
10.65%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIUX and FCQTX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020

0.62

The correlation between DRIUX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIUX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIUX
DRIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DRIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRIUXFCQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.61

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

11.86

-3.02

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIUX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRIUXFCQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.13

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.68

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.12

-0.48

Drawdowns

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIUX drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FCQTX drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIUX and FCQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIUXFCQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.95%

-27.34%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-9.83%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.28%

-15.53%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-27.34%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-0.45%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.07%

-5.88%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.16%

-0.99%

Volatility

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIUX) is 1.72%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that DRIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIUXFCQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

3.59%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

9.64%

-5.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

12.03%

-6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.39%

14.72%

-5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.89%

15.04%

-6.15%

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIUX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

DRIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than FCQTX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIUX
Dimensional 2025 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
5.07%5.26%4.40%4.53%7.77%5.60%3.72%2.25%2.44%1.39%1.41%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.22%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIUX and FCQTX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCQTX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to DRIUX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIUX dropped -26.95% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

FCQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIUX and FCQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer