DRIP vs. COTG
DRIP (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DRIP is passively managed, while COTG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. DRIP charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
DRIP vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -50.45% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
DRIP
- 1D
- -3.05%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- -50.45%
- 6M
- -43.03%
- 1Y
- -56.10%
- 3Y*
- -30.92%
- 5Y*
- -41.62%
- 10Y*
- -42.95%
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIP vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | -50.45% | 5.45% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIP and COTG is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIP vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
DRIP
COTG
DRIP vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRIP | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRIP | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | -0.28 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DRIP vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIP | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -25.69% | -74.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -23.48% | -76.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.45% | -8.35% | -82.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.12% | — | — |
Volatility
DRIP vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIP | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.64% | 40.65% | +14.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.36% | 40.65% | +27.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.59% | 40.65% | +55.94% |
DRIP vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIP vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | 3.99% | 2.86% | 4.38% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.96% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRIP and COTG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.
DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for DRIP and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer