PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRGN vs. CGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRGN vs. CGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than CGRO's -17.76% return.


DRGN

1D
-0.54%
1M
1.83%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
44.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGRO

1D
2.43%
1M
0.27%
6M
-20.41%
YTD
-17.76%
1Y
-16.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGN vs. CGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRGN and CGRO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.64

The correlation between DRGN and CGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRGN vs. CGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRGN
DRGN Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DRGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGN Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGN Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CGRO
CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGN vs. CGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRGNCGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.89

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.46

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

-0.93

+5.38

DRGN vs. CGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CGRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRGN and CGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRGN vs. CGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum CGRO drawdown of -36.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and CGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRGNCGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-36.53%

+15.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.86%

-36.53%

+15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-29.71%

+20.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-11.11%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

18.10%

-8.08%

Volatility

DRGN vs. CGRO - Volatility Comparison

Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) at 7.53%. This indicates that DRGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRGNCGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.08%

7.53%

+5.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.46%

16.19%

+9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.74%

22.86%

+12.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.74%

28.77%

+6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.74%

28.77%

+6.97%

DRGN vs. CGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CGRO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRGN vs. CGRO - Dividend Comparison

DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CGRO's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
3.40%2.48%2.47%0.21%
DRGN
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
1.06%1.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRGN and CGRO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRGN has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to CGRO (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGN dropped -20.86% vs CGRO's -36.53%.

On 1-year performance, DRGN leads with 44.44% vs -16.82% for CGRO. On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CGRO has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DRGN has performed better with a 44.44% return vs -16.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CGRO.

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.06% for DRGN.

They also come from different issuers: Themes and CoreValues Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.75% for CGRO.

DRGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRGN and CGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer