PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRES vs. VFMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRES vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.68% return.


DRES

1D
0.51%
1M
2.10%
YTD
20.00%
6M
18.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFMO

1D
0.11%
1M
5.53%
YTD
23.68%
6M
23.37%
1Y
43.34%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRES vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
20.00%2.65%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
23.68%-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DRES and VFMO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRES vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRES

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRES vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRES vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRESVFMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

0.66

+1.35

Drawdowns

DRES vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and VFMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRESVFMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-36.77%

+26.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-7.77%

+5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

Volatility

DRES vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRESVFMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

21.20%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

21.70%

-3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

23.57%

-5.20%

DRES vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRES vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than VFMO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRES
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF
0.30%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.63%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRES and VFMO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.

DRES is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.13% for VFMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRES and VFMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer