DRES vs. VFMO
DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRES is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by GMO, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRES charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
DRES vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.90% return.
DRES
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 23.90%
- 1Y
- 38.80%
- 3Y*
- 25.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DRES vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 20.22% | 2.50% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.90% | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRES and VFMO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRES vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
DRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFMO
DRES vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRES | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRES vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRES | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -36.77% | +26.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -5.33% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -7.70% | +5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.07% | — |
Volatility
DRES vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRES | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.34% | 22.90% | -4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 21.99% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 23.66% | -5.32% |
DRES vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRES has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRES vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than VFMO's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.53% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRES and VFMO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.
VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.53% for DRES.
DRES is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: GMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DRES and 0.13% for VFMO.
Find the right allocation for DRES and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer