DRDIX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DRDIX (Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DRDIX returned 9.77%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for MUHLX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRDIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRDIX achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DRDIX has underperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.

DRDIX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -2.91%
• YTD: -2.44%
• 6M: -3.34%
• 1Y: -4.21%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

MUHLX

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 12.70%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRDIX Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund	-2.44%	2.36%	18.69%	13.77%	-11.52%	24.46%	10.50%	30.30%	-0.65%	15.02%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	8.34%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DRDIX and MUHLX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between DRDIX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DRDIX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRDIX

DRDIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
DRDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DRDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DRDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DRDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DRDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 26
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRDIX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	1.27	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	1.77	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.22	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	1.80	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	6.23	-7.18

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRDIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRDIX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRDIX drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDIX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRDIX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-62.05%	+30.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.69%	-10.23%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.97%	-18.63%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.45%	-18.63%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.36%	-40.85%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-6.31%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-10.76%	+7.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	2.95%	+0.97%

Volatility

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) is 2.54%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that DRDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRDIX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	4.44%	-1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.57%	11.33%	-4.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.14%	14.51%	-5.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	14.63%	-0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	17.07%	-1.41%

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRDIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRDIX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

DRDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than MUHLX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRDIX Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund	3.72%	3.55%	11.15%	0.80%	1.88%	2.49%	1.21%	1.47%	1.55%	1.74%	1.11%	1.53%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.08%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRDIX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

DRDIX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRDIX or MUHLX?

MUHLX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to DRDIX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRDIX dropped -31.36% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.