DRDIX vs. FDVV
DRDIX (Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DRDIX returned 6.50%/yr vs 13.69%/yr for FDVV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRDIX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRDIX achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.
DRDIX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -2.91%
- 1Y
- -3.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
FDVV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRDIX Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund | -2.36% | 2.36% | 18.69% | 13.77% | -11.52% | 24.46% | 10.50% | 30.30% | -0.65% | 15.02% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -1.26% | 14.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRDIX and FDVV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DRDIX and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRDIX vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
DRDIX
FDVV
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRDIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.40 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.39 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 9.89 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRDIX drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDIX and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRDIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.36% | -40.25% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -9.30% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.97% | -15.90% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -20.18% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -1.31% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -3.79% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 2.24% | +1.66% |
Volatility
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund (DRDIX) is 2.55%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that DRDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRDIX | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 3.09% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 8.26% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.15% | 10.15% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 14.73% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 16.97% | -1.29% |
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRDIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRDIX vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
DRDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than FDVV's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRDIX Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend Fund | 3.71% | 3.55% | 11.15% | 0.80% | 1.88% | 2.49% | 1.21% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 1.11% | 1.53% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.86% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRDIX and FDVV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDVV has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to DRDIX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRDIX dropped -31.36% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRDIX and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer