PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. XPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. XPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
-3.76%
1M
-16.92%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XPAY

1D
0.71%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.21%
YTD
9.86%
1Y
20.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.23B$4.59B$3.52B
$1.68M$2.65M$3.83M

DRAM vs. XPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and XPAY is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.61

DRAM vs. XPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAM
XPAY

Technology

100.0%
38.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

8.9%

Industrials

-

8.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

-2.3%
11.6%

Technology

DRAM
100.0%
XPAY
38.5%

Basic Materials

DRAM

-

XPAY
1.7%

Communication Services

DRAM

-

XPAY
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAM

-

XPAY
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

DRAM

-

XPAY
4.5%

Energy

DRAM

-

XPAY
3.0%

Healthcare

DRAM

-

XPAY
8.9%

Industrials

DRAM

-

XPAY
8.4%

Real Estate

DRAM

-

XPAY
1.8%

Utilities

DRAM

-

XPAY
2.2%

Financial Services

DRAM
-2.3%
XPAY
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. XPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRAM vs. XPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRAMXPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

DRAM vs. XPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. XPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -44.44%, which is greater than XPAY's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and XPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMXPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.44%

-18.20%

-26.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.60%

-1.55%

-36.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-2.34%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

Volatility

DRAM vs. XPAY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMXPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.96%

12.70%

+88.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.96%

16.55%

+84.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.96%

16.55%

+84.41%

DRAM vs. XPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XPAY's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. XPAY - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.05%.


PositionTTM20252024
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
21.05%21.21%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and XPAY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPAY is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPAY is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 21.05%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while XPAY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.49% for XPAY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and XPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer