PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
-0.17%
1M
19.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDE

1D
0.67%
1M
-9.19%
YTD
3.16%
6M
4.00%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
42.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and GDE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.51

DRAM vs. GDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAM
GDE

Technology

100.0%
35.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.5%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

12.2%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

DRAM
100.0%
GDE
35.6%

Basic Materials

DRAM

-

GDE
1.4%

Communication Services

DRAM

-

GDE
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAM

-

GDE
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DRAM

-

GDE
5.5%

Energy

DRAM

-

GDE
3.4%

Financial Services

DRAM

-

GDE
12.2%

Healthcare

DRAM

-

GDE
8.3%

Industrials

DRAM

-

GDE
7.6%

Real Estate

DRAM

-

GDE
1.6%

Utilities

DRAM

-

GDE
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRAMGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

DRAM vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.97%

-32.01%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.74%

-16.53%

+9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-7.93%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

Volatility

DRAM vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.02%

29.88%

+57.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.02%

27.09%

+59.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.02%

27.09%

+59.93%

DRAM vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.19%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and GDE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.20% for GDE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer