PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
0.20%
1M
64.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and FTXL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026

0.57

DRAM vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAM
FTXL

Technology

100.0%
99.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DRAM
100.0%
FTXL
99.5%

Basic Materials

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Communication Services

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Energy

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Financial Services

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Healthcare

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Industrials

DRAM

-

FTXL
0.5%

Real Estate

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Utilities

DRAM

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAM

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAM vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAMFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

341.95

0.94

+341.02

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-43.87%

+33.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-10.56%

+8.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

Volatility

DRAM vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.92%

35.94%

+37.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.92%

36.02%

+37.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.92%

34.25%

+39.67%

DRAM vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and FTXL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.60% for FTXL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer