DRAM vs. AVALX
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and AVALX (Aegis Value Fund) are both funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AVALX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Aegis. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AVALX.
Performance
DRAM vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 27.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVALX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 17.29%
- 6M
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 48.80%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 20.79%
- 10Y*
- 20.09%
DRAM vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 140.78% |
AVALX Aegis Value Fund | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and AVALX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVALX
DRAM vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 21.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and AVALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.97% | -73.72% | +53.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -4.41% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -10.94% | +7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.02% | 17.35% | +69.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.02% | 22.31% | +64.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.02% | 22.18% | +64.84% |
DRAM vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVALX Aegis Value Fund | 1.99% | 2.34% | 7.07% | 2.23% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.62% | 2.36% | 6.18% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 0.04% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and AVALX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and AVALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer