PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAG vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAG vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAG

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
16.06%
6M
15.73%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


DRAG vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRAG
QDTE

Consumer Cyclical

72.4%

-

Communication Services

17.3%

-

Technology

10.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

5.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

DRAG
72.4%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

DRAG
17.3%
QDTE

-

Technology

DRAG
10.2%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Energy

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Financial Services

DRAG

-

QDTE
5.4%

Healthcare

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Industrials

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Real Estate

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Utilities

DRAG

-

QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAG vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAG

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAG vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAG vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAGQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAGQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-22.86%

+22.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-3.14%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

DRAG vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAGQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

14.81%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.42%

-18.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

18.42%

-18.42%

DRAG vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAG vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%.


PositionTTM20252024
DRAG
Roundhill China Dragons ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
43.41%49.49%32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

DRAG is categorized as China Equities, while QDTE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.97% for QDTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAG and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer