DRAG vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAG is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

DRAG vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 64.14%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	151.12%

DRAG vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAG	DRAM
Consumer Cyclical	72.4%	-
Communication Services	17.3%	-
Technology	10.2%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRAG vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAG	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	341.95	—

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAG	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-10.46%	+10.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.64%	+1.64%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAG	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	73.92%	-73.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	73.92%	-73.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	73.92%	-73.92%

DRAG vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAG vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAG nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DRAG or DRAM?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAG or DRAM?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAG or DRAM?

DRAG and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRAG and DRAM?

DRAG is categorized as China Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.65% for DRAM.