DRAG vs. CN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds. DRAG is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

DRAG vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%

DRAG vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAG	CN
Consumer Cyclical	72.4%	5.4%
Communication Services	17.3%	0.4%
Technology	10.2%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Energy	-	0.9%
Financial Services	-	55.1%
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

DRAG vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAG	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAG	CN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	—	—

DRAG vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAG vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRAG nor CN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DRAG or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAG or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for DRAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAG or CN?

DRAG and CN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRAG and CN?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.50% for CN.