PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DQEIX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DQEIX achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DQEIX has underperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


DQEIX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.84%
YTD
9.70%
6M
11.02%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
10.12%

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DQEIX
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund
9.70%24.64%6.54%9.70%-3.72%14.32%5.62%25.80%-5.61%18.18%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DQEIX and VGPMX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2007

0.65

The correlation between DQEIX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DQEIX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DQEIX
DQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DQEIXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.69

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

5.25

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

21.90

-13.40

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DQEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DQEIX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DQEIXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

4.02

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

1.19

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.26

+0.18

Drawdowns

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DQEIX drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DQEIX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DQEIXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-78.85%

+26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-12.80%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.21%

-14.63%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-22.71%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.69%

-54.59%

+21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

0.00%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-34.55%

+27.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.06%

-0.37%

Volatility

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund (DQEIX) is 3.23%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that DQEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DQEIXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

5.98%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

13.83%

-5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

16.76%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

17.38%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

20.87%

-6.25%

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DQEIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DQEIX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

DQEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DQEIX
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund
12.55%13.55%12.56%7.65%14.39%12.69%1.97%3.41%10.50%5.32%5.83%6.94%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DQEIX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to DQEIX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DQEIX dropped -52.75% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DQEIX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer