DPYE.L vs. TRET.L
DPYE.L (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - DPYE.L tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ (EUR Hedged) while TRET.L tracks the GPR Global 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DPYE.L returned 0.11%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for TRET.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DPYE.L charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TRET.L.
Performance
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DPYE.L is traded in EUR, while TRET.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRET.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPYE.L achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than TRET.L's 5.21% return.
DPYE.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 8.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
TRET.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYE.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 5.70% | 5.47% | 0.74% | 8.05% | -23.49% | 27.34% | -12.56% | 12.16% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.21% | 0.85% | 7.73% | 10.52% | -21.07% | 39.44% | -14.59% | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPYE.L and TRET.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DPYE.L and TRET.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DPYE.L
TRET.L
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DPYE.L
TRET.L
Financial Services
DPYE.L
TRET.L
Consumer Cyclical
DPYE.L
TRET.L
Basic Materials
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Communication Services
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Energy
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Healthcare
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Industrials
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Technology
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Utilities
DPYE.L
-
TRET.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L — Risk / Return Rank
DPYE.L
TRET.L
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (DPYE.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DPYE.L | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 3.39 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DPYE.L | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.21 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.21 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPYE.L drawdown since its inception was -41.46%, roughly equal to the maximum TRET.L drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPYE.L and TRET.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPYE.L | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.46% | -41.66% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -8.05% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.31% | -17.59% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.12% | -30.64% | -2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -4.19% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -12.26% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.60% | +0.18% |
Volatility
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (DPYE.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPYE.L | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.38% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 9.54% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 12.52% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 15.93% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 18.47% | -1.23% |
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPYE.L has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than TRET.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPYE.L vs. TRET.L - Dividend Comparison
DPYE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPYE.L iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.49% | 3.54% | 3.56% | 3.54% | 4.56% | 1.86% | 4.18% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DPYE.L and TRET.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DPYE.L.
DPYE.L tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+ (EUR Hedged), while TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for DPYE.L and 0.25% for TRET.L.
Find the right allocation for DPYE.L and TRET.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer