PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPST vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPST vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 45.96% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 48.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DPST has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -11.01%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.


DPST

1D
0.85%
1M
2.62%
6M
24.97%
YTD
45.96%
1Y
81.17%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
-14.99%
10Y*
-11.01%
ALL TIME*
-12.97%

TNA

1D
-1.37%
1M
-7.22%
6M
28.70%
YTD
48.69%
1Y
108.54%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
-4.05%
10Y*
7.13%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.57M$38.84M$44.12M
$284.85M$300.19M$411.47M

DPST vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
45.96%-5.90%15.48%-55.79%-54.10%108.31%-76.53%70.65%-56.75%7.28%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
48.69%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DPST and TNA is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.72

The correlation between DPST and TNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DPST vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DPST
TNA

Financial Services

100.0%
17.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Energy

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

20.3%

Industrials

-

14.2%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Technology

-

14.8%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Financial Services

DPST
100.0%
TNA
17.5%

Basic Materials

DPST

-

TNA
4.4%

Communication Services

DPST

-

TNA
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DPST

-

TNA
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

DPST

-

TNA
2.6%

Energy

DPST

-

TNA
5.5%

Healthcare

DPST

-

TNA
20.3%

Industrials

DPST

-

TNA
14.2%

Real Estate

DPST

-

TNA
6.6%

Technology

DPST

-

TNA
14.8%

Utilities

DPST

-

TNA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPST vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DPST
DPST Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DPST vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPSTTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.95

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

9.70

-5.78

DPST vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPST vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than TNA's maximum drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPSTTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-88.09%

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-32.53%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.38%

-65.78%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.99%

-82.36%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.73%

-88.09%

-9.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.06%

-37.12%

-53.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.52%

-33.92%

-30.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.85%

9.90%

+7.95%

Volatility

DPST vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) at 11.41%. This indicates that DPST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPSTTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.37%

11.41%

+4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

42.11%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.21%

57.87%

+10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.35%

67.19%

+21.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.21%

68.35%

+25.86%

DPST vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPST vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than TNA's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
1.50%2.18%1.55%1.78%1.51%0.58%0.90%1.29%2.18%0.30%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.31%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPST and TNA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DPST has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to TNA (11.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 7.13% vs -11.01% for DPST. On fees, DPST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TNA has been the lower-risk option at 11.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 7.13% return vs -11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DPST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

DPST has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.31% for TNA.

DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPST and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer