DPST vs. FAS
DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - DPST tracks the Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%) while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DPST returned -11.17%/yr vs 22.50%/yr for FAS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DPST charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.
Performance
DPST vs. FAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 31.18% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DPST has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of -11.17%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 22.50% annualized return.
DPST
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- 16.60%
- YTD
- 31.18%
- 6M
- 20.48%
- 1Y
- 66.43%
- 3Y*
- 41.35%
- 5Y*
- -20.53%
- 10Y*
- -11.17%
FAS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
DPST vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares | 31.18% | -5.90% | 15.48% | -55.79% | -54.10% | 108.31% | -76.53% | 70.65% | -56.75% | 7.28% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -10.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between DPST and FAS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DPST and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DPST vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DPST
FAS
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DPST
FAS
Basic Materials
DPST
-
FAS
-
Communication Services
DPST
-
FAS
-
Consumer Cyclical
DPST
-
FAS
-
Consumer Defensive
DPST
-
FAS
-
Energy
DPST
-
FAS
-
Healthcare
DPST
-
FAS
-
Industrials
DPST
-
FAS
Real Estate
DPST
-
FAS
-
Technology
DPST
-
FAS
Utilities
DPST
-
FAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DPST vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank
DPST
FAS
DPST vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DPST | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 0.13 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | 0.30 | +3.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DPST vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than FAS's maximum drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and FAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DPST | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -91.61% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.44% | -40.88% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.38% | -43.10% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.99% | -66.88% | -27.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.73% | -85.99% | -11.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.97% | -17.88% | -74.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.25% | -31.10% | -33.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.22% | 18.17% | +0.05% |
Volatility
DPST vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) has a higher volatility of 18.76% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 12.26%. This indicates that DPST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DPST | FAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.76% | 12.26% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.13% | 33.44% | +14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.32% | 43.36% | +25.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.98% | 55.35% | +33.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.46% | 61.18% | +33.28% |
DPST vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
DPST vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison
DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than FAS's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares | 1.61% | 2.18% | 1.55% | 1.78% | 1.51% | 0.58% | 0.90% | 1.29% | 2.18% | 0.30% |
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.32% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DPST and FAS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DPST has higher volatility (18.76%) compared to FAS (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs FAS's -91.61%.
On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 22.50% vs -11.17% for DPST. On fees, DPST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 22.50% return vs -11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DPST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.61% for DPST.
DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 1.00% for FAS.
DPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DPST and FAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer