DPST vs. FAS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares) and FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - DPST tracks the Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%) while FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DPST returned -14.35%/yr vs 18.78%/yr for FAS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DPST charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FAS.

Performance

DPST vs. FAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly higher than FAS's -21.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DPST has underperformed FAS with an annualized return of -14.35%, while FAS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.78% annualized return.

DPST

• 1D: 5.05%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 22.03%
• 1Y: 55.29%
• 3Y*: 26.25%
• 5Y*: -25.62%
• 10Y*: -14.35%

FAS

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -3.63%
• YTD: -21.74%
• 6M: -12.79%
• 1Y: -8.69%
• 3Y*: 35.72%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: 18.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPST vs. FAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares	12.91%	-5.90%	15.48%	-55.79%	-54.10%	108.31%	-76.53%	70.65%	-56.75%	7.28%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	-21.74%	21.48%	84.47%	14.92%	-43.19%	116.59%	-34.97%	113.04%	-33.84%	67.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DPST and FAS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015	0.79

The correlation between DPST and FAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DPST vs. FAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DPST	FAS
Financial Services	100.0%	98.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DPST vs. FAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPST

DPST Risk / Return Rank: 25
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FAS

FAS Risk / Return Rank: 7
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPST vs. FAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DPST	FAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	-0.20	+1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.00	+1.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.00	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	-0.20	+1.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.88	-0.47	+3.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DPST vs. FAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the FAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and FAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DPST	FAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	-0.20	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.07	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	0.31	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.16	0.20	-0.36

Drawdowns

DPST vs. FAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than FAS's maximum drawdown of -91.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and FAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DPST	FAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.73%	-91.61%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.44%	-40.88%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.38%	-43.10%	-25.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.99%	-66.88%	-27.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.73%	-85.99%	-11.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.08%	-28.19%	-64.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.11%	-31.11%	-33.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.97%	17.40%	+0.57%

Volatility

DPST vs. FAS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) has a higher volatility of 16.79% compared to Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) at 9.05%. This indicates that DPST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DPST	FAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.79%	9.05%	+7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.97%	32.42%	+14.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.01%	42.62%	+26.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.30%	55.46%	+33.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.57%	61.30%	+33.27%

DPST vs. FAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FAS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DPST vs. FAS - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FAS's 10.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DPST Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares	1.87%	2.18%	1.55%	1.78%	1.51%	0.58%	0.90%	1.29%	2.18%	0.30%
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares	10.66%	8.21%	0.76%	1.77%	0.91%	0.60%	0.47%	0.62%	1.43%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DPST and FAS in my portfolio?

DPST and FAS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DPST or FAS?

DPST has higher volatility (16.79%) compared to FAS (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs FAS's -91.61%.

Which ETF is better, DPST or FAS?

On 10-year performance, FAS leads with 18.78% vs -14.35% for DPST. On fees, DPST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 9.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DPST or FAS?

Over the 10-year period, FAS has performed better with a 18.78% return vs -14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DPST or FAS?

DPST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DPST or FAS?

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 1.87% for DPST.

What is the main difference between DPST and FAS?

DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 1.00% for FAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.