PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPST vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPST vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 31.18% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -32.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DPST having a -11.17% annualized return and NUGT not far behind at -11.63%.


DPST

1D
4.14%
1M
16.60%
YTD
31.18%
6M
20.48%
1Y
66.43%
3Y*
41.35%
5Y*
-20.53%
10Y*
-11.17%

NUGT

1D
-9.53%
1M
-19.60%
YTD
-32.09%
6M
-39.03%
1Y
60.88%
3Y*
55.65%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
-11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPST vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
31.18%-5.90%15.48%-55.79%-54.10%108.31%-76.53%70.65%-56.75%7.28%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-32.09%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%100.73%-44.52%3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DPST and NUGT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

-0.02

The correlation between DPST and NUGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DPST vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DPST
NUGT

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DPST
100.0%
NUGT

-

Basic Materials

DPST

-

NUGT
100.0%

Communication Services

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Defensive

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Energy

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Healthcare

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Industrials

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Real Estate

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Technology

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Utilities

DPST

-

NUGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPST vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPST
DPST Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPST vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DPSTNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.96

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.66

2.30

+1.35

DPST vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPST vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, roughly equal to the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPSTNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-99.97%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-63.43%

+22.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.38%

-63.43%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.99%

-73.72%

-20.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.73%

-96.91%

-0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.97%

-99.84%

+7.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.25%

-91.53%

+27.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.22%

26.52%

-8.30%

Volatility

DPST vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) is 18.76%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a volatility of 35.11%. This indicates that DPST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPSTNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.76%

35.11%

-16.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.13%

80.35%

-32.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.32%

94.31%

-24.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.98%

72.94%

+16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.46%

87.97%

+6.49%

DPST vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPST vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than NUGT's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
1.61%2.18%1.55%1.78%1.51%0.58%0.90%1.29%2.18%0.30%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.44%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPST and NUGT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGT has higher volatility (35.11%) compared to DPST (18.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 10-year performance, DPST leads with -11.17% vs -11.63% for NUGT. On fees, DPST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DPST has been the lower-risk option at 18.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DPST has performed better with a -11.17% return vs -11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DPST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

DPST has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.44% for NUGT.

DPST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 1.13% for NUGT.

DPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPST and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer