PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DPST vs. AMZU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DPST vs. AMZU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DPST (Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares) and AMZU (Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - DPST tracks the Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%) while AMZU tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DPST returned 27.84%/yr vs 19.98%/yr for AMZU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DPST charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for AMZU.

Performance

DPST vs. AMZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 31.95% return, which is significantly higher than AMZU's -2.29% return.

DPST

1D
4.45%
1M
28.35%
YTD
31.95%
6M
20.81%
1Y
70.24%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
-21.69%
10Y*
-11.82%

AMZU

1D
-2.47%
1M
-23.21%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
1.11%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPST vs. AMZU - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares		31.95%-5.90%15.48%-55.79%-14.73%
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares		-2.29%-11.59%60.99%118.70%-49.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DPST and AMZU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022

0.29

The correlation between DPST and AMZU shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DPST vs. AMZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DPST
AMZU

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DPST
100.0%
AMZU

-

Basic Materials

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Communication Services

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Consumer Cyclical

DPST

-

AMZU
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Energy

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Healthcare

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Industrials

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Real Estate

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Technology

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Utilities

DPST

-

AMZU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares

Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares

Often compared with DPST:
DPST vs. KREDPST vs. FASDPST vs. BNKUDPST vs. NAILDPST vs. KBWBDPST vs. DRNDPST vs. SOXL
Often compared with AMZU:
AMZU vs. AMZZAMZU vs. AMZNAMZU vs. FSKAXAMZU vs. AAPUAMZU vs. TECLAMZU vs. SCHGAMZU vs. FNGU

Return for Risk

DPST vs. AMZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DPST
DPST Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
AMZU
AMZU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AMZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZU Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZU Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPST vs. AMZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DPSTAMZUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.02
0.04

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.64
0.50

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.06

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

0.06

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

0.14

+3.75

DPST vs. AMZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the AMZU Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and AMZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DPST vs. AMZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than AMZU's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and AMZU.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DPSTAMZUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-55.59%

-42.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-42.98%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.38%

-55.47%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.99%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.73%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.92%

-28.03%

-63.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.19%

-21.91%

-42.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.15%

19.28%

-1.13%

Volatility

DPST vs. AMZU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) has a higher volatility of 18.15% compared to Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares (AMZU) at 15.85%. This indicates that DPST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DPSTAMZUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.15%

15.85%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.26%

41.43%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.42%

60.07%

+9.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.39%

59.12%

+30.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.58%

59.12%

+35.46%

DPST vs. AMZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZU's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

DPST vs. AMZU - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than AMZU's 6.21% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZU
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares		6.21%6.12%3.79%3.37%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares		1.60%2.18%1.55%1.78%1.51%0.58%0.90%1.29%2.18%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

DPST and AMZU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DPST has higher volatility (18.15%) compared to AMZU (15.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs AMZU's -55.59%.

On 3-year performance, DPST leads with 27.84% vs 19.98% for AMZU. On fees, DPST is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZU has been the lower-risk option at 15.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DPST has performed better with a 27.84% return vs 19.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DPST is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AMZU.

AMZU has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 1.60% for DPST.

DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while AMZU tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 1.06% for AMZU.

DPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPST and AMZU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer