DOO vs. LCII
DOO (BRP Inc) and LCII (LCI Industries) are both stocks. Both operate in the Recreational Vehicles industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, DOO returned 15.02%/yr vs 4.40%/yr for LCII. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DOO vs. LCII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOO achieves a -12.11% return, which is significantly higher than LCII's -13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DOO has outperformed LCII with an annualized return of 15.02%, while LCII has yielded a comparatively lower 4.40% annualized return.
DOO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- 6M
- -17.49%
- YTD
- -12.11%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- -11.33%
- 5Y*
- -4.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.56%
LCII
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -28.84%
- YTD
- -13.97%
- 1Y
- 12.87%
- 3Y*
- -5.15%
- 5Y*
- -3.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
DOO BRP Inc | $13.72M | $13.50M | $14.70M |
LCII LCI Industries | $33.27M | $46.04M | $48.13M |
DOO vs. LCII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOO BRP Inc | -12.11% | 41.18% | -28.32% | -5.37% | -12.35% | 33.74% | 44.98% | 77.45% | -29.76% | 75.41% |
LCII LCI Industries | -13.97% | 22.83% | -14.64% | 41.10% | -38.49% | 23.07% | 24.13% | 65.13% | -47.23% | 23.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOO and LCII is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013 | 0.37 |
The correlation between DOO and LCII shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DOO:
$4.54B
LCII:
$2.49B
DOO:
CA$3.65
LCII:
$7.71
DOO:
23.71
LCII:
13.27
DOO:
1.29
LCII:
0.49
DOO:
0.71
LCII:
0.61
DOO:
9.20
LCII:
1.83
DOO:
CA$8.99B
LCII:
$4.12B
DOO:
CA$2.05B
LCII:
$980.30M
DOO:
CA$1.01B
LCII:
$381.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOO vs. LCII — Risk / Return Rank
DOO
LCII
DOO vs. LCII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BRP Inc (DOO) and LCI Industries (LCII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.10 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 0.29 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 0.63 | +0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOO vs. LCII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOO drawdown since its inception was -75.49%, smaller than the maximum LCII drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOO and LCII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.49% | -87.55% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.43% | -41.76% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.78% | -41.76% | -21.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.60% | -47.19% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.49% | -53.89% | -21.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | -33.57% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.02% | -25.29% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.00% | 19.47% | -2.47% |
Volatility
DOO vs. LCII - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BRP Inc (DOO) is 7.08%, while LCI Industries (LCII) has a volatility of 9.91%. This indicates that DOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOO | LCII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 9.91% | -2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.71% | 27.49% | +23.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.65% | 36.30% | +15.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.52% | 39.37% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.41% | 39.94% | +6.47% |
Dividends
DOO vs. LCII - Dividend Comparison
DOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than LCII's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOO BRP Inc | 1.39% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.61% | 0.13% | 0.66% | 1.05% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCII LCI Industries | 4.49% | 3.79% | 4.16% | 3.34% | 4.38% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 3.52% | 1.58% | 1.30% | 3.28% |
Financials
DOO vs. LCII - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BRP Inc and LCI Industries. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DOO vs. LCII - Profitability Comparison
DOO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BRP Inc reported a gross profit of 561.60M and revenue of 2.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
LCII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
DOO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BRP Inc reported an operating income of 222.30M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.3%.
LCII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
DOO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BRP Inc reported a net income of 129.50M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
LCII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DOO and LCII have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCII has higher volatility (9.91%) compared to DOO (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOO dropped -75.49% vs LCII's -87.55%.
DOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOO and LCII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer