DON vs. AUSF
DON (WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - DON tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DON returned 7.54%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DON charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.
Performance
DON vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DON achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.
DON
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
DON vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DON WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF | 7.24% | 3.86% | 14.20% | 14.04% | -4.72% | 30.29% | -5.40% | 23.31% | -14.56% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DON and AUSF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DON and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DON vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DON
AUSF
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
DON
AUSF
Industrials
DON
AUSF
Consumer Cyclical
DON
AUSF
Real Estate
DON
AUSF
Energy
DON
AUSF
Utilities
DON
AUSF
Basic Materials
DON
AUSF
Technology
DON
AUSF
Communication Services
DON
AUSF
Consumer Defensive
DON
AUSF
Healthcare
DON
AUSF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DON vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank
DON
AUSF
DON vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DON | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.60 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.93 | 7.54 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DON | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.94 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DON vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DON drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DON and AUSF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DON | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.94% | -44.25% | -17.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -5.84% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | -12.29% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.46% | -14.23% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -2.26% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -4.22% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.01% | +0.89% |
Volatility
DON vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF (DON) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that DON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DON | AUSF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.41% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 6.65% | +2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.97% | 10.14% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 13.65% | +4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 19.07% | +1.19% |
DON vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DON has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
DON vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison
DON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DON WisdomTree US MidCap Dividend ETF | 2.36% | 2.53% | 2.27% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.12% | 2.77% | 2.38% | 2.55% | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DON and AUSF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DON has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DON dropped -61.94% vs AUSF's -44.25%.
On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 7.54% for DON. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DON.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.36% for DON.
DON tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Dividend Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DON and 0.27% for AUSF.
AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DON and AUSF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer