DOL vs. UMMA
DOL (WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DOL is passively managed, while UMMA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DOL returned 20.43%/yr vs 21.92%/yr for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DOL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
DOL vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOL achieves a 13.28% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 29.52% return.
DOL
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 13.28%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.43%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
UMMA
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 29.52%
- 6M
- 30.57%
- 1Y
- 50.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOL vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOL WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund | 13.28% | 37.35% | 4.08% | 16.77% | -7.61% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 29.52% | 26.65% | 4.67% | 18.84% | -21.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOL and UMMA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between DOL and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOL vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOL
UMMA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
DOL
UMMA
Technology
DOL
UMMA
Industrials
DOL
UMMA
Healthcare
DOL
UMMA
Consumer Defensive
DOL
UMMA
Consumer Cyclical
DOL
UMMA
Utilities
DOL
UMMA
-
Basic Materials
DOL
UMMA
Communication Services
DOL
UMMA
Energy
DOL
UMMA
Real Estate
DOL
UMMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOL vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
DOL
UMMA
DOL vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.42 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 13.07 | -3.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOL vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOL drawdown since its inception was -60.79%, which is greater than UMMA's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.79% | -34.17% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -14.93% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.44% | -18.73% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -5.07% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -9.73% | -3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.89% | -0.87% |
Volatility
DOL vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) is 5.80%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that DOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 12.08% | -6.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 20.30% | -6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 22.74% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 21.08% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 21.08% | -4.64% |
DOL vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOL vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
DOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than UMMA's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOL WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund | 2.47% | 2.83% | 3.78% | 4.02% | 4.47% | 3.58% | 2.82% | 3.50% | 4.03% | 3.17% | 3.58% | 3.66% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOL and UMMA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UMMA has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to DOL (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOL dropped -60.79% vs UMMA's -34.17%.
On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 21.92% vs 20.43% for DOL. On fees, DOL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DOL has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 21.92% return vs 20.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
DOL has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.95% for UMMA.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DOL and 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOL and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer