DOGG vs. AMDW
DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. DOGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
DOGG vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOGG achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.
DOGG
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -7.20%
- 1M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 176.01%
- 6M
- 174.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 7.19% | 6.81% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 176.01% | 36.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOGG and AMDW is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOGG vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank
DOGG
AMDW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOGG vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOGG | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOGG vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOGG drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOGG and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOGG | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -34.64% | +23.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -7.20% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -14.25% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | — | — |
Volatility
DOGG vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOGG | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.66% | 83.41% | -72.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 83.41% | -70.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 83.41% | -70.44% |
DOGG vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOGG vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, less than AMDW's 37.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 37.14% | 34.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.72% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOGG and AMDW have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 8.72% for DOGG.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DOGG and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for DOGG and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer