PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOG vs. DDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOG vs. DDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed DDM with an annualized return of -11.12%, while DDM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.


DOG

1D
-1.25%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-5.66%
YTD
-7.91%
1Y
-14.94%
3Y*
-8.74%
5Y*
-5.96%
10Y*
-11.12%
ALL TIME*
-10.39%

DDM

1D
2.57%
1M
0.82%
6M
13.42%
YTD
19.12%
1Y
42.83%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.46M$13.17M$12.37M
$40.68M$37.60M$41.71M

DOG vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
-7.91%-8.40%-5.62%-7.05%5.67%-19.21%-20.45%-18.43%3.55%-21.51%
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
19.12%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DOG and DDM is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

-0.99

The correlation between DOG and DDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOG vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOG
DDM

Financial Services

82.8%
27.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.0%

Communication Services

-

5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

1.9%

Healthcare

-

13.4%

Industrials

-

17.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

16.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DOG
82.8%
DDM
27.0%

Basic Materials

DOG

-

DDM
4.0%

Communication Services

DOG

-

DDM
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DOG

-

DDM
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

DOG

-

DDM
3.9%

Energy

DOG

-

DDM
1.9%

Healthcare

DOG

-

DDM
13.4%

Industrials

DOG

-

DDM
17.9%

Real Estate

DOG

-

DDM

-

Technology

DOG

-

DDM
16.3%

Utilities

DOG

-

DDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOG vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DOG
DOG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DOG vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOGDDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.29

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.05

2.23

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.87

8.20

-10.07

DOG vs. DDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOG Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the DDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOG and DDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOG vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.90%, which is greater than DDM's maximum drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and DDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOGDDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.90%

-81.70%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.32%

-19.31%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.86%

-31.62%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.93%

-40.18%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.07%

-63.13%

-6.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.90%

0.00%

-92.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.59%

-17.20%

-49.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.65%

5.24%

+3.41%

Volatility

DOG vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 3.81%, while ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOGDDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

7.60%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

19.83%

-9.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

25.07%

-12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

29.64%

-14.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

34.77%

-17.27%

DOG vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DOG and DDM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

DOG vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison

DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DDM's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.91%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
3.43%3.65%5.72%4.54%0.41%0.00%0.14%1.54%0.86%0.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOG and DDM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDM has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to DOG (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.90% vs DDM's -81.70%.

On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 19.57% vs -11.12% for DOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 19.57% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOG and DDM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.91% for DDM.

DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DDM is Leveraged Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%).

DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOG and DDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer