DOG vs. DDM
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while DDM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DOG returned -11.12%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for DDM. Their -0.99 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DOG vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -7.91% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed DDM with an annualized return of -11.12%, while DDM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.57% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -7.91%
- 1Y
- -14.94%
- 3Y*
- -8.74%
- 5Y*
- -5.96%
- 10Y*
- -11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.39%
DDM
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.46M | $13.17M | $12.37M | |
| $40.68M | $37.60M | $41.71M |
DOG vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -7.91% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 19.12% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and DDM is -1.00, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.99 |
The correlation between DOG and DDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOG vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOG
DDM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DOG
DDM
Basic Materials
DOG
-
DDM
Communication Services
DOG
-
DDM
Consumer Cyclical
DOG
-
DDM
Consumer Defensive
DOG
-
DDM
Energy
DOG
-
DDM
Healthcare
DOG
-
DDM
Industrials
DOG
-
DDM
Real Estate
DOG
-
DDM
-
Technology
DOG
-
DDM
Utilities
DOG
-
DDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
DDM
DOG vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.05 | 2.23 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.87 | 8.20 | -10.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.90%, which is greater than DDM's maximum drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and DDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.90% | -81.70% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.32% | -19.31% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.86% | -31.62% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.93% | -40.18% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.07% | -63.13% | -6.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.90% | 0.00% | -92.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.59% | -17.20% | -49.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 5.24% | +3.41% |
Volatility
DOG vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 3.81%, while ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 7.60% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 19.83% | -9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 25.07% | -12.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 29.64% | -14.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 34.77% | -17.27% |
DOG vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DOG and DDM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DOG vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DDM's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.91% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.43% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and DDM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDM has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to DOG (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.90% vs DDM's -81.70%.
On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 19.57% vs -11.12% for DOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 19.57% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG and DDM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 0.91% for DDM.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DDM is Leveraged Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%).
DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and DDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer