PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOCT vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DOCT vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DOCT vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October
-1.95%12.50%2.83%
PBFR
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
-0.75%10.44%5.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's -0.75% return.


DOCT

1D
1.47%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-1.95%
6M
0.52%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*

PBFR

1D
1.19%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
1.42%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DOCT vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DOCT vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCT
DOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCT vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOCTPBFRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.34

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.20

1.99

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.84

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.15

10.86

+0.29

DOCT vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCT and PBFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOCTPBFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.34

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.20

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between DOCT and PBFR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DOCT vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

DOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Drawdowns

DOCT vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and PBFR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DOCTPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-8.50%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.90%

-6.15%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-1.56%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.68%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.04%

+0.17%

Volatility

DOCT vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that DOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DOCTPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.42%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

3.46%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.96%

8.18%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

7.13%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.33%

7.13%

+42.20%