PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOCT vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOCT vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOCT achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.95% return.


DOCT

1D
0.03%
1M
1.90%
YTD
5.27%
6M
5.91%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
11.03%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.15%
1M
0.89%
YTD
61.95%
6M
59.31%
1Y
57.89%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOCT vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October
5.27%12.50%8.28%16.13%-5.27%6.89%145.69%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
61.95%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DOCT and OILK is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2020

0.06

The correlation between DOCT and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DOCT vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOCT
OILK

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

DOCT
36.2%
OILK

-

Financial Services

DOCT
11.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

DOCT
10.9%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

DOCT
10.1%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

DOCT
8.4%
OILK

-

Industrials

DOCT
8.1%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

DOCT
4.9%
OILK

-

Energy

DOCT
3.5%
OILK

-

Utilities

DOCT
2.3%
OILK

-

Real Estate

DOCT
1.9%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

DOCT
1.8%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOCT vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOCT
DOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOCT vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOCTOILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.89

2.03

+0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.36

2.55

+1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.34

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.61

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.21

7.33

+12.88

DOCT vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOCT and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOCTOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.03

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.59

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.11

+0.42

Drawdowns

DOCT vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOCTOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-83.76%

+73.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.34%

-17.35%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

-23.42%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.92%

-34.69%

+24.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.99%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-32.62%

+31.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

8.56%

-7.70%

Volatility

DOCT vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) is 0.88%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that DOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOCTOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

11.11%

-10.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.40%

23.24%

-18.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

28.86%

-22.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.33%

30.11%

-22.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

35.98%

+12.62%

DOCT vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOCT vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

DOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.29%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOCT and OILK have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to DOCT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCT dropped -9.92% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.52% vs 7.82% for DOCT. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.52% return vs 7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DOCT.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.00% for DOCT.

DOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. DOCT tracks S&P 500, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DOCT and 0.68% for OILK.

DOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOCT and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer