DOCT vs. BUFD
DOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October) and BUFD (FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. DOCT is passively managed, while BUFD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOCT returned 7.74%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for BUFD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFD.
Performance
DOCT vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DOCT having a 5.06% return and BUFD slightly higher at 5.08%.
DOCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 16.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
DOCT vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October | 5.06% | 12.50% | 8.28% | 16.13% | -5.27% | 6.16% |
BUFD FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | 5.08% | 10.66% | 12.42% | 15.40% | -7.70% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCT and BUFD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DOCT and BUFD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOCT vs. BUFD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOCT
BUFD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DOCT
BUFD
Financial Services
DOCT
BUFD
Communication Services
DOCT
BUFD
Consumer Cyclical
DOCT
BUFD
Healthcare
DOCT
BUFD
Industrials
DOCT
BUFD
Consumer Defensive
DOCT
BUFD
Energy
DOCT
BUFD
Utilities
DOCT
BUFD
Real Estate
DOCT
BUFD
Basic Materials
DOCT
BUFD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOCT vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank
DOCT
BUFD
DOCT vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOCT | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.58 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 4.21 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | 22.97 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOCT | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.79 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.99 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.00 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
DOCT vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCT drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum BUFD drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCT and BUFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOCT | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -10.75% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.34% | -3.43% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | -10.15% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.92% | -10.75% | +0.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.15% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -1.97% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.63% | +0.23% |
Volatility
DOCT vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - October (DOCT) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) at 0.79%. This indicates that DOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOCT | BUFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 0.79% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.40% | 3.94% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.96% | 5.19% | +0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.33% | 7.73% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.58% | 7.55% | +41.03% |
DOCT vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOCT vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DOCT nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DOCT and BUFD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DOCT has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to BUFD (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCT dropped -9.92% vs BUFD's -10.75%.
On 5-year performance, DOCT leads with 7.74% vs 7.62% for BUFD. On fees, DOCT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DOCT has performed better with a 7.74% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOCT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFD.
DOCT and BUFD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DOCT and 0.95% for BUFD.
BUFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOCT and BUFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer