DOCS vs. URA
DOCS (Doximity, Inc.) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 3 years, DOCS returned -14.86%/yr vs 32.17%/yr for URA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DOCS vs. URA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOCS achieves a -54.74% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 6.53% return.
DOCS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -14.32%
- YTD
- -54.74%
- 6M
- -54.30%
- 1Y
- -64.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
DOCS vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCS Doximity, Inc. | -54.74% | -17.06% | 90.41% | -16.45% | -33.05% | 21.76% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCS and URA is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DOCS and URA has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOCS vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank
DOCS
URA
DOCS vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOCS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.14 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 1.04 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.30 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOCS vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCS drawdown since its inception was -82.35%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCS and URA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOCS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.35% | -93.54% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.03% | -31.48% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | -37.81% | -40.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.36% | -48.34% | -32.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -74.94% | +17.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.49% | 14.12% | +31.37% |
Volatility
DOCS vs. URA - Volatility Comparison
Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) has a higher volatility of 29.57% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 17.69%. This indicates that DOCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOCS | URA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.57% | 17.69% | +11.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.93% | 39.95% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.14% | 51.24% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.07% | 43.96% | +26.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.07% | 37.91% | +32.16% |
Dividends
DOCS vs. URA - Dividend Comparison
DOCS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOCS Doximity, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOCS and URA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOCS has higher volatility (29.57%) compared to URA (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOCS dropped -82.35% vs URA's -93.54%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOCS and URA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer