PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNYMX vs. DFSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNYMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than DFSVX's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DNYMX has underperformed DFSVX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while DFSVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.


DNYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.21%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.34%

DFSVX

1D
0.96%
1M
2.50%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.74%
1Y
34.94%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
11.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
0.98%2.69%2.87%2.76%-1.17%-0.10%1.26%2.42%1.02%1.74%
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
16.32%8.37%9.58%19.02%-3.57%39.97%2.24%18.15%-15.13%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between DNYMX and DFSVX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

-0.02

The correlation between DNYMX and DFSVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNYMX vs. DFSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNYMX
DNYMX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DNYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DNYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSVX
DFSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) and DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNYMXDFSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.18

1.38

+2.80

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.55

3.93

+8.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.41

12.54

+43.87

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNYMX Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the DFSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNYMX and DFSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNYMXDFSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

2.15

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.82

0.48

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

0.48

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.53

+0.80

Drawdowns

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNYMX drawdown since its inception was -3.19%, smaller than the maximum DFSVX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNYMX and DFSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNYMXDFSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-66.70%

+63.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-9.59%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-27.69%

+26.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.53%

-27.69%

+25.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.19%

-52.12%

+48.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-9.47%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

2.99%

-2.94%

Volatility

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) is 0.20%, while DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that DNYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNYMXDFSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

4.26%

-4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.49%

11.34%

-10.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

17.53%

-16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.88%

21.49%

-20.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.05%

23.90%

-22.85%

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNYMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSVX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNYMX vs. DFSVX - Dividend Comparison

DNYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than DFSVX's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSVX
DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I
1.50%1.69%1.47%3.67%6.77%10.40%1.96%2.83%7.54%5.18%4.18%5.29%
DNYMX
DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.65%2.36%2.73%1.92%0.70%0.59%1.06%1.31%1.21%1.04%1.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNYMX and DFSVX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSVX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNYMX dropped -3.19% vs DFSVX's -66.70%.

DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNYMX and DFSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer