DFSVX vs. DFSCX
DFSVX (DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I) and DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DFSVX returned 11.91%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for DFSCX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSVX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFSCX.
Performance
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSVX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly lower than DFSCX's 20.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFSVX having a 11.91% annualized return and DFSCX not far behind at 11.87%.
DFSVX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 16.82%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 33.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
DFSCX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 18.44%
- 1Y
- 38.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I | 16.82% | 8.37% | 9.58% | 19.02% | -3.57% | 39.97% | 2.24% | 18.15% | -15.13% | 6.82% |
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 20.66% | 9.65% | 11.43% | 17.93% | -12.49% | 33.70% | 6.61% | 20.68% | -11.60% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSVX and DFSCX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 1993 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFSVX and DFSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSVX vs. DFSCX — Risk / Return Rank
DFSVX
DFSCX
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSVX | DFSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 4.95 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 16.06 | -4.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSVX drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, which is greater than DFSCX's maximum drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSVX and DFSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSVX | DFSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.70% | -63.07% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -8.17% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.69% | -27.01% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.69% | -27.01% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.12% | -46.88% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | 0.00% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -9.89% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.51% | +0.48% |
Volatility
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I (DFSVX) is 4.09%, while DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that DFSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSVX | DFSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.54% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 11.91% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 17.75% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.00% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 22.66% | +1.24% |
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSVX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSCX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSVX vs. DFSCX - Dividend Comparison
DFSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than DFSCX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 0.79% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 2.48% | 5.16% | 10.77% | 0.87% | 2.80% | 5.50% | 5.05% | 0.90% | 6.33% |
DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Portfolio I | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.47% | 3.67% | 6.77% | 10.40% | 1.96% | 2.83% | 7.54% | 5.18% | 4.18% | 5.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFSVX and DFSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFSCX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFSVX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSVX dropped -66.70% vs DFSCX's -63.07%.
DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSVX and DFSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer