DNOV vs. DJUL
DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) and DJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - DNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while DJUL is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DNOV returned 8.18%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for DJUL. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
DNOV vs. DJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DNOV having a 4.96% return and DJUL slightly lower at 4.86%.
DNOV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
DJUL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
DNOV vs. DJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 4.96% | 13.93% | 10.71% | 18.52% | -7.50% | 6.03% | 6.07% |
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July | 4.86% | 13.31% | 15.02% | 18.08% | -8.28% | 6.18% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNOV and DJUL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DNOV and DJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
DNOV vs. DJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DNOV
DJUL
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DNOV
DJUL
Financial Services
DNOV
DJUL
Communication Services
DNOV
DJUL
Consumer Cyclical
DNOV
DJUL
Healthcare
DNOV
DJUL
Industrials
DNOV
DJUL
Consumer Defensive
DNOV
DJUL
Energy
DNOV
DJUL
Utilities
DNOV
DJUL
Real Estate
DNOV
DJUL
Basic Materials
DNOV
DJUL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNOV vs. DJUL — Risk / Return Rank
DNOV
DJUL
DNOV vs. DJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNOV | DJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | 2.99 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | 4.53 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.64 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 4.01 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.48 | 21.68 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNOV | DJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | 2.99 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.07 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.11 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
DNOV vs. DJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, which is greater than DJUL's maximum drawdown of -12.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and DJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNOV | DJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -12.54% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -4.25% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.98% | -11.29% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.98% | -12.54% | +2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -2.00% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.79% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DNOV vs. DJUL - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) at 0.64%. This indicates that DNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNOV | DJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.64% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 4.16% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 5.65% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.62% | 8.39% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 7.94% | +1.10% |
DNOV vs. DJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DNOV and DJUL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
DNOV vs. DJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DNOV nor DJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DNOV and DJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DNOV has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to DJUL (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOV dropped -15.03% vs DJUL's -12.54%.
On 5-year performance, DJUL leads with 8.95% vs 8.18% for DNOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, DJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DJUL has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DNOV and DJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
DNOV and DJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DJUL is Options Trading. DNOV tracks S&P 500, while DJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index.
DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNOV and DJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer