PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNOV vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNOV vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 68.39% return.


DNOV

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.61%
6M
4.92%
YTD
5.68%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

DBE

1D
-1.09%
1M
6.25%
6M
65.69%
YTD
68.39%
1Y
57.64%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
17.10%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNOV vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
5.68%13.93%10.71%18.52%-7.50%6.03%7.49%1.37%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
68.39%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DNOV and DBE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.12

The correlation between DNOV and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNOV vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOV
DNOV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOV vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNOVDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.28

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

2.34

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.90

7.00

+11.90

DNOV vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOV and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNOV vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNOVDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-86.69%

+71.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.18%

-24.72%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.98%

-24.72%

+14.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.98%

-38.74%

+28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-36.07%

+35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-57.19%

+55.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

8.26%

-7.47%

Volatility

DNOV vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) is 1.11%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that DNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNOVDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

11.68%

-10.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

32.70%

-28.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.61%

35.99%

-30.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

29.88%

-22.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.98%

28.39%

-19.41%

DNOV vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNOV vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

DNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.29%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
DNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNOV and DBE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to DNOV (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOV dropped -15.03% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.10% vs 8.25% for DNOV. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, DNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DNOV.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.00% for DNOV.

DNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. DNOV tracks S&P 500, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DNOV and 0.78% for DBE.

DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNOV and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer