DNOV vs. BGLD
DNOV (FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November) and BGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from FT Vest. DNOV is passively managed, while BGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DNOV returned 8.18%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for BGLD. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DNOV charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BGLD.
Performance
DNOV vs. BGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DNOV achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than BGLD's 0.84% return.
DNOV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
BGLD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DNOV vs. BGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 4.96% | 13.93% | 10.71% | 18.52% | -7.50% | 5.43% |
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 0.84% | 33.03% | 21.80% | 13.24% | -2.42% | -5.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DNOV and BGLD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DNOV vs. BGLD — Risk / Return Rank
DNOV
BGLD
DNOV vs. BGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DNOV | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.17 | 1.12 | +2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.78 | 1.55 | +3.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.22 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 1.39 | +2.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.48 | 4.47 | +19.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DNOV | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17 | 1.12 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.06 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
DNOV vs. BGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DNOV drawdown since its inception was -15.03%, smaller than the maximum BGLD drawdown of -16.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOV and BGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DNOV | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.03% | -16.19% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -11.11% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.98% | -11.11% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.98% | -15.52% | +5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.73% | +6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.64% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 3.46% | -2.68% |
Volatility
DNOV vs. BGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November (DNOV) is 0.85%, while FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF (BGLD) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that DNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DNOV | BGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 2.52% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 10.03% | -5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.73% | 12.04% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.62% | 9.98% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 9.89% | -0.85% |
DNOV vs. BGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLD's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
DNOV vs. BGLD - Dividend Comparison
DNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Quarterly Buffer ETF | 43.95% | 44.32% | 25.04% | 10.49% | 0.40% |
DNOV FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DNOV and BGLD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGLD has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to DNOV (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOV dropped -15.03% vs BGLD's -16.19%.
On 5-year performance, BGLD leads with 11.43% vs 8.18% for DNOV. On fees, DNOV is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DNOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BGLD has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DNOV is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for BGLD.
BGLD has the higher dividend yield at 43.95%, compared with 0.00% for DNOV.
Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DNOV and 0.91% for BGLD.
DNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DNOV and BGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer