DNOPY vs. GFI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DNOPY (Dino Polska S.A) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. DNOPY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, DNOPY returned 4.36%/yr vs 32.03%/yr for GFI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DNOPY vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOPY achieves a -30.21% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -13.96% return.

DNOPY

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -2.29%
• YTD: -30.21%
• 6M: -27.27%
• 1Y: -40.59%
• 3Y*: -11.34%
• 5Y*: 4.36%
• 10Y*: —

GFI

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -17.25%
• YTD: -13.96%
• 6M: -13.63%
• 1Y: 47.65%
• 3Y*: 39.19%
• 5Y*: 32.03%
• 10Y*: 27.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNOPY vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A	-30.21%	19.79%	-16.65%	30.68%	2.43%	10.75%	89.61%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	-13.96%	240.42%	-6.27%	44.90%	-2.61%	23.33%	16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DNOPY and GFI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020	0.03

The correlation between DNOPY and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap DNOPY : $7.95B GFI : $32.65B
EPS DNOPY : PLN 1.59 GFI : $5.39
PE Ratio DNOPY : 18.78 GFI : 6.78
PEG Ratio DNOPY : 1.07 GFI : 0.11
PS Ratio DNOPY : 0.85 GFI : 2.34
PB Ratio DNOPY : 3.26 GFI : 3.87
Total Revenue (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 34.60B GFI : $13.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 8.12B GFI : $7.34B
EBITDA (TTM) DNOPY : PLN 2.57B GFI : $8.04B

Return for Risk

DNOPY vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOPY

DNOPY Risk / Return Rank: 7
DNOPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
DNOPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DNOPY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

GFI

GFI Risk / Return Rank: 67
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOPY vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DNOPY	GFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	0.85	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.34	1.41	-2.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.18	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	1.15	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	3.06	-4.61

DNOPY vs. GFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOPY Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOPY and GFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DNOPY vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOPY drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOPY and GFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNOPY	GFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.35%	-88.05%	+39.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.35%	-43.90%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.35%	-43.90%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.35%	-56.22%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.50%	-38.93%	-7.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	-44.25%	+29.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.94%	16.51%	+10.43%

Volatility

DNOPY vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) is 10.78%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 17.70%. This indicates that DNOPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNOPY	GFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.78%	17.70%	-6.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.91%	46.40%	-9.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.59%	59.94%	-16.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.31%	52.37%	+5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.67%	54.90%	+4.77%

Dividends

DNOPY vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

DNOPY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	5.04%	1.77%	2.94%	2.87%	3.40%	3.24%	1.72%	0.81%	1.61%	1.41%	1.35%	0.60%

Financials

DNOPY vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dino Polska S.A and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

DNOPY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 8.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.0%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

DNOPY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported an operating income of 419.22M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

DNOPY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dino Polska S.A reported a net income of 315.98M and revenue of 8.44B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DNOPY and GFI in my portfolio?

DNOPY and GFI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DNOPY or GFI?

GFI has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to DNOPY (10.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNOPY dropped -48.35% vs GFI's -88.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.