PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNL vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNL vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DNL has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 9.17%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


DNL

1D
-0.96%
1M
3.92%
YTD
10.17%
6M
11.58%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
9.17%

USFR

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.66%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
10.17%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.60%4.23%5.47%5.18%1.98%-0.03%0.56%2.02%2.01%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and USFR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014

-0.01

The correlation between DNL and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNL vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-49.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

13.43

-12.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

203.42

-201.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.55

787.84

-782.29

DNL vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLUSFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

15.11

-14.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

9.26

-9.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

3.07

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.60

-1.34

Drawdowns

DNL vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-1.36%

-43.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-0.02%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-0.06%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-0.18%

-34.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-0.80%

-34.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-0.16%

-10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

0.01%

+3.45%

Volatility

DNL vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that DNL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

0.06%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

0.18%

+14.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

0.27%

+17.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

0.40%

+17.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

0.81%

+17.84%

DNL vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNL vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.66%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNL and USFR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNL has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 10-year performance, DNL leads with 9.17% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DNL has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DNL.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.66% for DNL.

DNL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.11 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNL and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer