PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNL vs. PIZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNL vs. PIZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNL achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than PIZ's 11.39% return. Over the past 10 years, DNL has underperformed PIZ with an annualized return of 9.11%, while PIZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


DNL

1D
1.22%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
8.34%
6M
9.46%
1Y
15.54%
3Y*
10.20%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
9.11%

PIZ

1D
1.61%
1M
-8.26%
YTD
11.39%
6M
13.04%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNL vs. PIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.34%17.03%-0.61%17.00%-22.38%16.14%18.22%36.23%-14.76%31.11%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
11.39%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DNL and PIZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2008

0.81

The correlation between DNL and PIZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DNL vs. PIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DNL
PIZ

Technology

33.0%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

18.5%
1.6%

Industrials

16.3%
49.9%

Healthcare

10.6%
1.1%

Energy

6.5%
2.0%

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Financial Services

4.0%
28.1%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
2.1%

Utilities

0.5%
1.6%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Technology

DNL
33.0%
PIZ
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DNL
18.5%
PIZ
1.6%

Industrials

DNL
16.3%
PIZ
49.9%

Healthcare

DNL
10.6%
PIZ
1.1%

Energy

DNL
6.5%
PIZ
2.0%

Communication Services

DNL
6.2%
PIZ

-

Financial Services

DNL
4.0%
PIZ
28.1%

Basic Materials

DNL
3.2%
PIZ
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

DNL
1.2%
PIZ
2.1%

Utilities

DNL
0.5%
PIZ
1.6%

Real Estate

DNL

-

PIZ
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNL vs. PIZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNL
DNL Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNL Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNL vs. PIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) and Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNLPIZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.58

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.48

6.10

-1.62

DNL vs. PIZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNL Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the PIZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNL and PIZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DNLPIZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.07

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.48

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.27

-0.01

Drawdowns

DNL vs. PIZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNL drawdown since its inception was -44.53%, smaller than the maximum PIZ drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNL and PIZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNLPIZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.53%

-60.61%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-14.35%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.15%

-14.67%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-40.93%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

-40.93%

+6.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-8.26%

+5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-14.87%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.70%

-0.22%

Volatility

DNL vs. PIZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DNL) is 6.56%, while Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that DNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNLPIZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

9.11%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

18.84%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

21.21%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

20.09%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

19.73%

-1.03%

DNL vs. PIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DNL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PIZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DNL vs. PIZ - Dividend Comparison

DNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than PIZ's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNL
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.69%2.06%2.30%1.81%4.82%1.38%1.76%1.93%2.55%1.86%2.51%1.98%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.40%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNL and PIZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to DNL (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNL dropped -44.53% vs PIZ's -60.61%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 10.56% vs 9.11% for DNL. On fees, DNL is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DNL has been the lower-risk option at 6.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DNL is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

DNL has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 1.40% for PIZ.

DNL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PIZ is Momentum. DNL tracks WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DNL and 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNL and PIZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer