PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. USFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. USFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than USFI's 0.56% return.


DMBS

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.36%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.38%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.41%

USFI

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.83%
6M
0.47%
YTD
0.56%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.27M$2.67M$3.33M
$231.12$248.47$6.98K

DMBS vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
-0.38%8.54%2.09%2.29%
USFI
BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF
0.56%6.96%1.11%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and USFI is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023

0.89

The correlation between DMBS and USFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

USFI
USFI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
USFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
USFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DMBS vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DMBSUSFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.46

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

8.04

-4.39

DMBS vs. USFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the USFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and USFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, roughly equal to the maximum USFI drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and USFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSUSFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-8.47%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-1.11%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-7.69%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-1.00%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-2.06%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.47%

+0.62%

Volatility

DMBS vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) at 0.74%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSUSFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.74%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.37%

1.66%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

3.20%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

6.84%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

6.84%

-0.63%

DMBS vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than USFI's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
4.78%4.96%4.97%2.82%
USFI
BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF
4.04%4.42%4.60%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


DMBS and USFI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to USFI (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs USFI's -8.47%.

On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.54% vs 3.91% for USFI. On fees, USFI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, USFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.04% for USFI.

DMBS is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.39% for USFI.

USFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and USFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer