DMBS vs. DBND
DMBS (Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMBS is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. DMBS is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMBS returned 4.62%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for DBND. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMBS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.
Performance
DMBS vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.
DMBS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 6.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMBS vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF | 0.51% | 8.54% | 2.09% | 1.31% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.21% | 7.41% | 3.06% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMBS and DBND is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between DMBS and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMBS vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
DMBS
DBND
DMBS vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMBS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.48 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.49 | 2.23 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.72 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 5.10 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMBS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.48 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.48 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
DMBS vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and DBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMBS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -9.39% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.20% | -2.83% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.24% | -6.25% | -0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.80% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -2.27% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.95% | -0.05% |
Volatility
DMBS vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMBS | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.07% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.33% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.18% | 3.30% | +0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 5.09% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 5.09% | +1.19% |
DMBS vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMBS vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than DBND's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.79% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% |
DMBS Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF | 5.12% | 4.96% | 4.97% | 2.82% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DMBS and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs DBND's -9.39%.
On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.62% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, DMBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.62% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.79% for DBND.
DMBS is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.50% for DBND.
DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMBS and DBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer