PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMBS vs. DBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMBS vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMBS achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.


DMBS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.61%
1Y
6.86%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
10Y*

DBND

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMBS vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
0.51%8.54%2.09%1.31%
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.21%7.41%3.06%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DMBS and DBND is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

0.93

The correlation between DMBS and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMBS vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMBS vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMBSDBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.72

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

5.10

+2.52

DMBS vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMBS and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMBSDBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.48

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.48

+0.14

Drawdowns

DMBS vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMBS drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMBS and DBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMBSDBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-9.39%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.20%

-2.83%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-6.25%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.80%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-2.27%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.95%

-0.05%

Volatility

DMBS vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that DMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMBSDBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.07%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.33%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

3.30%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

5.09%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

5.09%

+1.19%

DMBS vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMBS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMBS vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

DMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.12%, more than DBND's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.79%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.12%4.96%4.97%2.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DMBS and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMBS dropped -8.14% vs DBND's -9.39%.

On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.62% vs 4.50% for DBND. On fees, DMBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.62% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.79% for DBND.

DMBS is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DMBS and 0.50% for DBND.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMBS and DBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer