DABS vs. NUG
DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and NUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while NUG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NUG.
Performance
DABS vs. NUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than NUG's -57.59% return.
DABS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUG
- 1D
- -4.30%
- 1M
- -34.47%
- YTD
- -57.59%
- 6M
- -61.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS vs. NUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 0.88% | 0.68% |
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | -57.59% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DABS and NUG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DABS vs. NUG — Risk / Return Rank
DABS
NUG
DABS vs. NUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DABS | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DABS | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.05 | -0.94 | +2.99 |
Drawdowns
DABS vs. NUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum NUG drawdown of -65.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and NUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DABS | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -65.69% | +64.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -65.69% | +65.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -29.27% | +28.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
DABS vs. NUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DABS | NUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 80.36% | -77.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 80.36% | -77.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 80.36% | -77.80% |
DABS vs. NUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than NUG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DABS vs. NUG - Dividend Comparison
DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, while NUG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.89% | 3.81% |
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DABS and NUG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NUG.
DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for NUG.
DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while NUG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.75% for NUG.
Find the right allocation for DABS and NUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer