DMAY vs. DFND
DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAY returned 7.26%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for DFND. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DMAY charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.
Performance
DMAY vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DMAY
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 0.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.16%
DMAY vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.73% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAY and DFND is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DMAY and DFND has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DMAY vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAY
DFND
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DMAY
DFND
Financial Services
DMAY
DFND
Communication Services
DMAY
DFND
Consumer Cyclical
DMAY
DFND
Healthcare
DMAY
DFND
Industrials
DMAY
DFND
Consumer Defensive
DMAY
DFND
Energy
DMAY
DFND
Utilities
DMAY
DFND
-
Real Estate
DMAY
DFND
Basic Materials
DMAY
DFND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAY vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
DMAY
DFND
DMAY vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAY | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.79 | 0.02 | +2.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.20 | 0.11 | +4.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.02 | +0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 0.07 | +3.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.92 | 0.13 | +24.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAY | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 0.02 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.21 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.36 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
DMAY vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAY drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAY and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAY | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -22.65% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.36% | -3.44% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.38% | -12.56% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.90% | -22.65% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.69% | +3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -5.70% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 3.70% | -3.15% |
Volatility
DMAY vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAY | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.00% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 6.16% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.71% | 10.92% | -6.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 22.46% | -13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 19.09% | -10.66% |
DMAY vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAY vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAY and DFND have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMAY has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAY dropped -13.90% vs DFND's -22.65%.
On 5-year performance, DMAY leads with 7.26% vs 4.54% for DFND. On fees, DMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DMAY has performed better with a 7.26% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAY and 1.50% for DFND.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAY and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer