PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMAX vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMAX vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAX achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


DMAX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.83%
YTD
2.42%
6M
3.14%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
1.21%
1M
0.73%
YTD
60.58%
6M
58.21%
1Y
56.66%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAX vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DMAX and USL is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

-0.09

The correlation between DMAX and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMAX vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAX vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMAXUSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.74

2.00

+1.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.80

2.54

+3.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.33

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.15

3.67

+2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.49

7.44

+24.05

DMAX vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAX and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMAXUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74

2.00

+1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.16

0.01

+2.15

Drawdowns

DMAX vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.37%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAX and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMAXUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-89.06%

+85.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.41%

-16.76%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-39.10%

+39.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-61.46%

+61.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

8.26%

-7.98%

Volatility

DMAX vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) is 0.33%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that DMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMAXUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

11.15%

-10.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

23.30%

-21.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

28.65%

-26.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.40%

30.07%

-26.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

32.35%

-28.95%

DMAX vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DMAX vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DMAX and USL have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to DMAX (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAX dropped -3.37% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 1-year performance, USL leads with 56.66% vs 8.68% for DMAX. On fees, DMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USL has performed better with a 56.66% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

DMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

DMAX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USL is Oil & Gas. DMAX tracks S&P 500 Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DMAX and 0.88% for USL.

DMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMAX and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer