DLUX vs. CUSD
DLUX (DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DLUX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.
Performance
DLUX vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DLUX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CUSD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLUX vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 1.37% |
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLUX and CUSD is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLUX vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF (DLUX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLUX | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLUX vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLUX drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLUX and CUSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLUX | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.13% | -5.42% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.95% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.51% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
DLUX vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLUX | CUSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 16.25% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.88% | 8.04% | -7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.88% | 8.04% | -7.16% |
DLUX vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLUX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLUX vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison
DLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while CUSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF | 13.65% | 14.05% | 7.10% | 3.62% | 1.14% |
DLUX DoubleLine Ultrashort Income ETF | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLUX and CUSD have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DLUX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DLUX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.
CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.65%, compared with 0.80% for DLUX.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DLUX and 0.81% for CUSD.
Find the right allocation for DLUX and CUSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer