DLS vs. SCZ
DLS (WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - DLS tracks the WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index while SCZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DLS returned 8.17%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for SCZ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
DLS vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than SCZ's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 8.17%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
DLS
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
SCZ
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
DLS vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 5.03% | 34.11% | 3.06% | 15.33% | -17.31% | 11.71% | -1.28% | 22.20% | -18.95% | 31.83% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 7.29% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLS and SCZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between DLS and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DLS vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DLS
SCZ
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
DLS
SCZ
Financial Services
DLS
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
DLS
SCZ
Basic Materials
DLS
SCZ
Technology
DLS
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
DLS
SCZ
Real Estate
DLS
SCZ
Communication Services
DLS
SCZ
Healthcare
DLS
SCZ
Energy
DLS
SCZ
Utilities
DLS
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLS vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
DLS
SCZ
DLS vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.83 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 6.88 | -0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLS vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.13% | -61.86% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -11.43% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -15.06% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.22% | -36.87% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.77% | -41.07% | -3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.66% | -3.82% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -13.03% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.03% | +0.06% |
Volatility
DLS vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) is 4.61%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that DLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 5.14% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 12.69% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 15.01% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 16.82% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 17.20% | -0.75% |
DLS vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLS vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than SCZ's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 3.55% | 3.87% | 4.56% | 4.29% | 4.96% | 3.29% | 2.50% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 2.79% | 3.29% | 2.72% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.25% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DLS and SCZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCZ has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to DLS (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, SCZ leads with 8.70% vs 8.17% for DLS. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCZ has performed better with a 8.70% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.
DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.25% for SCZ.
DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.40% for SCZ.
DLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLS and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer