PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.


DLS

1D
-0.94%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.37%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
7.46%

QGRW

1D
-1.04%
1M
9.03%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.57%
1Y
35.66%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLS vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.63%34.11%3.06%15.33%1.08%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
15.43%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and QGRW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.55

The correlation between DLS and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

DLS vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
QGRW

Industrials

27.8%
8.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
12.4%

Basic Materials

8.9%

-

Technology

8.4%
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
0.5%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
17.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
4.3%

Energy

3.0%
0.6%

Utilities

2.1%
0.4%

Industrials

DLS
27.8%
QGRW
8.0%

Financial Services

DLS
13.3%
QGRW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.8%
QGRW
12.4%

Basic Materials

DLS
8.9%
QGRW

-

Technology

DLS
8.4%
QGRW
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.9%
QGRW
0.5%

Real Estate

DLS
7.8%
QGRW

-

Communication Services

DLS
4.4%
QGRW
17.8%

Healthcare

DLS
3.7%
QGRW
4.3%

Energy

DLS
3.0%
QGRW
0.6%

Utilities

DLS
2.1%
QGRW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLS vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLSQGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.32

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.55

9.08

-1.53

DLS vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLSQGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.06

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.66

-1.32

Drawdowns

DLS vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-24.40%

-38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-15.44%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-24.40%

+11.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-1.33%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-3.26%

-10.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.94%

-0.95%

Volatility

DLS vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.71%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

13.67%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

17.40%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

21.08%

-5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

21.08%

-4.41%

DLS vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLS and QGRW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DLS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.10% vs 17.27% for DLS. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 17.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.28% for QGRW.

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer