DLS vs. IWR
DLS (WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DLS returned 8.07%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for IWR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.
Performance
DLS vs. IWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed IWR with an annualized return of 8.07%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
DLS
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
IWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
DLS vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 7.56% | 34.11% | 3.06% | 15.33% | -17.31% | 11.71% | -1.28% | 22.20% | -18.95% | 31.83% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 13.23% | 10.37% | 15.21% | 17.05% | -17.48% | 22.44% | 16.93% | 30.23% | -9.10% | 18.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLS and IWR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between DLS and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
DLS vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DLS
IWR
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
DLS
IWR
Financial Services
DLS
IWR
Consumer Cyclical
DLS
IWR
Basic Materials
DLS
IWR
Technology
DLS
IWR
Consumer Defensive
DLS
IWR
Real Estate
DLS
IWR
Communication Services
DLS
IWR
Healthcare
DLS
IWR
Energy
DLS
IWR
Utilities
DLS
IWR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLS vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank
DLS
IWR
DLS vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLS | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.68 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.11 | 10.26 | -3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLS vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than IWR's maximum drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and IWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLS | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.13% | -58.78% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -8.17% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -21.09% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.22% | -26.18% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.77% | -40.59% | -4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | 0.00% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.63% | -7.80% | -5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 2.13% | +0.93% |
Volatility
DLS vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 4.49%. This indicates that DLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLS | IWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 4.49% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 10.34% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 13.79% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 18.28% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 19.38% | -2.70% |
DLS vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLS vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison
DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than IWR's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLS WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend | 3.47% | 3.87% | 4.56% | 4.29% | 4.96% | 3.29% | 2.50% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 2.79% | 3.29% | 2.72% |
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.98% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLS and IWR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLS has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to IWR (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs IWR's -58.78%.
On 10-year performance, IWR leads with 11.79% vs 8.07% for DLS. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWR has performed better with a 11.79% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.
DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.14% for IWR.
DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.19% for IWR.
IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLS and IWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer