PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLR vs. PM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLR vs. PM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLR achieves a 19.87% return, which is significantly higher than PM's 15.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DLR has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 9.89%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


DLR

1D
0.74%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
19.87%
6M
21.68%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
24.63%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
9.89%

PM

1D
1.95%
1M
-2.80%
YTD
15.93%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLR vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLR
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
19.87%-10.07%35.90%39.95%-41.00%30.66%20.37%16.52%-3.00%19.80%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
15.93%37.99%34.34%-1.85%12.31%20.78%3.69%35.02%-33.30%19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DLR and PM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008

0.27

The correlation between DLR and PM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DLR:

$4.53

PM:

$7.12

PE Ratio

DLR:

40.63

PM:

25.90

PEG Ratio

DLR:

1.09

PM:

2.81

PS Ratio

DLR:

9.48

PM:

6.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLR:

$5.09B

PM:

$41.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLR:

$1.67B

PM:

$27.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

DLR:

$3.18B

PM:

$17.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLR vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLR
DLR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PM
PM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLR vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLRPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.18

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

0.34

+0.75

DLR vs. PM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the PM Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLR and PM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLR vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLR drawdown since its inception was -56.80%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLR and PM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLRPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.80%

-42.87%

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.83%

-20.64%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.40%

-20.64%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.52%

-22.78%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.52%

-42.87%

-5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.67%

-3.94%

-5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-10.02%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

10.81%

-3.99%

Volatility

DLR vs. PM - Volatility Comparison

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) have volatilities of 7.62% and 7.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLRPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

7.76%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.30%

21.07%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

27.73%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.58%

22.73%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.19%

24.46%

+3.73%

Dividends

DLR vs. PM - Dividend Comparison

DLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than PM's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLR
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.99%3.15%2.75%3.63%4.87%2.62%3.21%3.61%3.79%3.27%3.58%4.50%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.13%3.52%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%

Financials

DLR vs. PM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Digital Realty Trust, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
303.36M
10.15B
(DLR) Total Revenue
(PM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DLR vs. PM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Digital Realty Trust, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
68.1%
Portfolio components
DLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 303.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.91B and revenue of 10.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.1%.

DLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 195.64M and revenue of 303.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.5%.

PM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.89B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.4%.

DLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -12.46M and revenue of 303.36M, resulting in a net margin of -4.1%.

PM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.44B and revenue of 10.15B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DLR and PM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PM has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to DLR (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLR dropped -56.80% vs PM's -42.87%.

DLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLR and PM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer