PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLR.TO vs. GEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR.TO) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DLR.TO is traded in CAD, while GEV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GEV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLR.TO achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 65.29% return.


DLR.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
1.45%
6M
3.41%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
5.33%
10Y*
2.47%

GEV

1D
-4.48%
1M
12.41%
6M
66.07%
YTD
65.29%
1Y
101.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DLR.TO
Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF
4.60%-1.34%9.01%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
65.29%89.93%202.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DLR.TO and GEV is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLR.TO vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLR.TO
DLR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DLR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DLR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR.TO) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLR.TOGEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.39

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

12.62

-8.18

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the GEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLR.TO and GEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLR.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum GEV drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLR.TO and GEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLR.TOGEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-39.32%

+21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-23.14%

+19.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-11.54%

+11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-6.91%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

8.04%

-6.55%

Volatility

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR.TO) is 1.05%, while GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that DLR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLR.TOGEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

20.26%

-19.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

36.35%

-33.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24%

52.26%

-48.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

54.47%

-48.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.57%

54.47%

-47.90%

Dividends

DLR.TO vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison

DLR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than GEV's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DLR.TO
Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF
3.88%3.33%3.23%4.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.19%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLR.TO and GEV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLR.TO and GEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer