DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO
DLR.TO (Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF) and QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLR.TO is a Currency fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DLR.TO returned 4.57% vs 44.08% for QQCL.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLR.TO achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than QQCL.TO's 20.29% return.
DLR.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
QQCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 20.29%
- 6M
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 44.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DLR.TO Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF | 2.10% | -1.35% | 12.83% | -1.59% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 20.29% | 13.10% | 41.38% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLR.TO and QQCL.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DLR.TO
QQCL.TO
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR.TO) and Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLR.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.50 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 4.11 | -2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 15.38 | -12.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLR.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.79 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.51 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLR.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum QQCL.TO drawdown of -25.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLR.TO and QQCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLR.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -25.63% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.94% | -10.68% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.47% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -3.32% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.85% | -1.32% |
Volatility
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR.TO) is 0.84%, while Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that DLR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLR.TO | QQCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 4.34% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 12.59% | -9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 15.75% | -11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 20.37% | -14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 20.37% | -13.73% |
Dividends
DLR.TO vs. QQCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
DLR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than QQCL.TO's 13.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLR.TO Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF | 3.46% | 3.33% | 3.22% | 4.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.75% |
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 13.21% | 14.54% | 11.87% | 3.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLR.TO and QQCL.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLR.TO is categorized as Currency, while QQCL.TO is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for DLR.TO and QQCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer