DLQAX vs. FCGSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DLQAX (BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund) and FCGSX (Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DLQAX returned 13.07%/yr vs 24.67%/yr for FCGSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLQAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCGSX.

Performance

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLQAX achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.92% return. Over the past 10 years, DLQAX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 13.07%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.67% annualized return.

DLQAX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 7.86%
• 6M: 7.88%
• 1Y: 22.96%
• 3Y*: 17.72%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

FCGSX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 8.76%
• YTD: 23.92%
• 6M: 25.96%
• 1Y: 56.65%
• 3Y*: 34.73%
• 5Y*: 19.86%
• 10Y*: 24.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DLQAX BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund	7.86%	14.27%	21.29%	16.81%	-23.77%	27.21%	23.57%	29.30%	-6.06%	24.54%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	23.92%	25.52%	38.00%	45.97%	-32.15%	25.13%	70.01%	39.75%	-4.03%	37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DLQAX and FCGSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013	0.89

The correlation between DLQAX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DLQAX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLQAX

DLQAX Risk / Return Rank: 45
DLQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DLQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
DLQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DLQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DLQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FCGSX

FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLQAX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	3.32	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	4.10	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.54	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	5.62	-3.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.58	25.64	-15.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLQAX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLQAX	FCGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	3.32	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.84	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	1.07	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.98	-0.71

Drawdowns

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLQAX drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLQAX and FCGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLQAX	FCGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.38%	-38.77%	-31.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-10.42%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	-26.07%	+3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.77%	-38.77%	+8.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-38.77%	+4.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.68%	-6.96%	-11.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.28%	-0.04%

Volatility

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) is 2.88%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that DLQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLQAX	FCGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	4.38%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	13.35%	-4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.12%	17.66%	-5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.63%	23.66%	-6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	23.24%	-4.45%

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLQAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLQAX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

DLQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.30%, more than FCGSX's 8.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DLQAX BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund	23.30%	21.34%	47.67%	35.24%	15.74%	14.22%	3.69%	4.70%	15.48%	3.90%	1.90%	5.38%
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund	8.45%	10.48%	12.49%	3.13%	0.61%	38.65%	31.99%	11.06%	13.21%	10.51%	2.44%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLQAX and FCGSX in my portfolio?

DLQAX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLQAX or FCGSX?

FCGSX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to DLQAX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLQAX dropped -70.38% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.