PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLQAX vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLQAX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLQAX achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DLQAX has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 13.07%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


DLQAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.29%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.88%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
13.07%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLQAX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
7.86%14.27%21.29%16.81%-23.77%27.21%23.57%29.30%-6.06%24.54%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DLQAX and SPY is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.94

The correlation between DLQAX and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLQAX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLQAX
DLQAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DLQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DLQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLQAX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLQAXSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.16

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.58

14.72

-4.13

DLQAX vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLQAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLQAX and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLQAXSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.38

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.82

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.87

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.59

-0.32

Drawdowns

DLQAX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLQAX drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLQAX and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLQAXSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-55.19%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-8.88%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-18.76%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.77%

-24.50%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-33.72%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-9.05%

-9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.91%

+0.33%

Volatility

DLQAX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLQAXSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

2.84%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.90%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

11.83%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

17.05%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

17.94%

+0.85%

DLQAX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLQAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLQAX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

DLQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.30%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
23.30%21.34%47.67%35.24%15.74%14.22%3.69%4.70%15.48%3.90%1.90%5.38%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DLQAX and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DLQAX has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLQAX dropped -70.38% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLQAX and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer